Implementation & Adoption Stories

FAIR-enabling and trustworthy data repositories play a central role in making and keeping data FAIR over time. While there is ongoing debate on what constitutes trustworthiness, there is broad agreement that transparency and evidence is essential to enable end users to make informed decisions about the repository services they use.

Paris Lodron University of Salzburg (PLUS) participated in two of FAIRIMPACT’s support programmes: one aimed at Research Performing Organisations (RPOS), and the other designed for Repositories and Data Service Providers. This FAIR Implementation Story outlines the specific aims and actions of PLUS in relation to their participation in these support programmes.

This FAIR Implementation Story outlines the experience of the Lithuanian Data Archive for Social Sciences and Humanities hosted by the Centre for Data Analysis and Archiving of Kaunas University of Technology (LiDA/KTU) in relation to their self assessment.

The support action did not focus on any specific PID type but rather provide general best practice guidelines on the creation and assessment of PID policies. This FAIR Implementation Story outlines the experience of the Swedish National Data Service in relation to their self assessment.

The persistent identification of research outputs is part of good research data management practice and is central to the FAIR Principles and the vision of the European Open Science Cloud (EOSC). There are many types of persistent identifiers (PIDs) currently being used to identify data and other kinds of research outputs but also different actors involved in the creation of outputs and the organisations that employ them or fund their work.

The persistent identification of research outputs is part of good research data management practice and is central to the FAIR Principles and the vision of the European Open Science Cloud (EOSC). There are many types of persistent identifiers (PIDs) currently being used to identify data and other kinds of research outputs but also different actors involved in the creation of outputs and the organisations that employ them or fund their work.

FAIR-IMPACT’s RPO support programme aimed to help research performing organisations to better understand their drivers for becoming more FAIRenabling, to self-assess their current FAIR-enabling capacity and develop plans for improvement.

This FAIR Implementation Story outlines the specific aims and actions of Simula Research Laboratory in relation to their participation in one or both support actions.

FAIR Signposting and RO-Crate. During the 3-month support action, participants took part in three virtual workshops to implement FAIR Signposting and RO-Crate to improve the discovery and consumption of their content and metadata. Participants benefited from interacting with mentors representing FAIR Signposting and RO-Crate.

This FAIR Implementation Story outlines the specific aims and actions of AZTI in relation to their participation in the RPO support programme.

This FAIR Implementation Story outlines the specific aims and actions of FISABIO in relation to their participation in the RPO support programme.

This FAIR Implementation Story outlines the specific aims and actions of Research Stations of the Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences and the Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry of the University of Helsinki in relation to their participation in the RPO support programme.